Victory and Defeat: Prezcon 2016 Day 2

From a game success perspective, my day started promising and ended in flames.  From a game fun experience, I was riding high through the day and into the night. 


In addition to the tournaments and open gaming that I described previously, Prezcon hosts a large number of demos.  Game masters and sometimes game designers teach demonstrate and teach the games.  People's abilities to teach games becomes very apparent in demos.  I appreciate someone who is organized and who begins with the game objectives.  I have actually walked out of demos when the demonstrator has focused on cool parts of the mechanics or jumps around different elements of the game (if you have been to Marscon, you may have heard me and Deb Fuller talk about the best methods of teaching games to others).


Acting on the advice of my friend Nathan Twigg, I attended The Game of Thrones demo.  The demonstrator, with a little prodding with directed questions from me and another player, did a pretty good job in teaching the game.  I could see elements of Diplomacy, Shogun/Samurai Swords, and some other area control games in this game.  It looked like fun, so I decided to take the plunge with seven other new players and enter the GoT tournament.


Gameplay Summary

• Settlers of Catan:  I won this game and advanced to the quarterfinals scheduled for Sunday morning!  I set up with good sheep access (the board was strong with sheep) and then managed to build a settlement on the sheep port.   A decisive point in the game was when I played Monopoly to gather 14 or sheep
• History of the World:  I come to Prezcon specifically to play this game.  Where else
  
  can I gather five other people to play a five to six hour game?  I had a strong start after the first two epochs with a good point total and picking cards first, but as the game progressed I never caught any strong civilizations until the last epoch.  I ended up finishing a disappointing last
• The Game of Thrones:  This was the first time I played this game.  Of the six players at the table, three were first timers, two had played the game once before, and one person knew the game intimately.  I played House Baratheon and proposed an
  
  alliance to the one player familiar with the game who was House Martell.  This rewarded me in the first half of the game as we took it to the Tyrells and I was tied for first place.  It fell apart when House Tyrell and House Lannister allied and I learned some new things about the mechanics of the game.  I finished the game tied with the Starks...for last

If it wasn't for the need for food and rest, I could have also played another game of Castles of Burgundy.  I also bailed on playing Tzolk'in:  The Mayan Calendar early in the morning because of it potential to conflict with the Catan game I was planning to play later that morning.  There are so many choices for games, and the schedule only gets more congested from here!

Boardgaming Fun: Prezcon 2016 Day 1

Prezcon is a boardgaming convention in Charlottesville, Virginia.  It is a gathering of hundreds of players playing scores of different boardgames in tournaments and as pick up games.  As I have done several times in the past, I have taken several days off work to play here.  The convention is also an embarrassment of riches in terms of games to play.  My friends Tara and Twiggy have the same "problem" as me:  we have so many tournament games in which we wish to play that we cannot play them all.  Winning preliminary heat games, in fact, advances us to semi-final or final games that create even more schedule conflicts with other games we want to play.  It's great!




Prezcon Tournament Plaques

There are two parts to Prezcon:  tournament play and open gaming.  Tournament play brings together players from all over the Mid-Atlantic region and beyond (there are players from as far away as Wisconsin, Alaska, and Massachusetts).  There are a mix of players from those just learning games to ones who are highly skilled.  The tournament players, however, are consistently good sports, which creates a competitive, yet friendly, environment in which to play.  Open gaming provides the opportunity to learn new games or play ones with which you are familiar.  Prezcon has a large open gaming room with a game library that spans a 40 wall of the room.  While open gaming is relatively quiet early in the convention, it will become packed by the weekend.



For the first time, I arrived at the convention site on Tuesday.  I worked during the morning and then spent the afternoon, evening, and night playing games.  In talking with several other people, I discovered that I was not alone in deciding to arrive early to Prezcon.  Several people that I know looked at the convention schedule and decided that there were enough interesting games on Monday and Tuesday to justify arriving early in the week.  I tip my hat to convention chairman Justin Thompson for scheduling games for Monday and Tuesday, thereby promoting the expanded playing time.

My gameplay summary (that I have also recorded in the Board Game Stats app, which is great boardgame nerd fun.  It is $3 on the App Store

• 4 games played, of those, 3 were tournament games
• Settlers of Catan:  I came within one turn of winning this game, not once, but twice (!)
• Castles of Burgundy (first time played at Prezcon):  playing for only the second time in three years, I muddled through the first few turns and still managed to finish a respectable second out of four.  Playing this reminded me of how fun this game is
• Roll for the Galaxy (first time I played at Prezcon):  I finished third out of four in my tournament game, but I was only one point behind first and second (scores were 36, 36, 35, and 27).  I also played a pick up game outside the tournament.  This game plays fast when everyone is familiar with the game

If you have never been to Prezcon, or perhaps if you are considering coming up this weekend – do it!  The combination of hundreds of good and friendly players, over 100 boardgame tournaments, a huge open gaming room with a game library that covers a 40 foot wide wall, and a nice venue make it a great time.  For myself, I am taking three and a half days of vacation to be here, but even coming for the weekend would be great fun.

Rowing in Difficult Conditions

I learned more this weekend about what I am capable of doing in terms of rowing. Specifically, I learned about what kind of adverse conditions I can row in and what kind of risks I am willing to take. This comes from having a better understanding of my own abilities and the abilities of those rowing with me.

I learned that I can row in adverse conditions with a coxswain I don't know – there are more good coxswains out there than I realized. In the two years I have rowed – I am still learning quite a bit about the sport – I have found three coxswains that I have learned to absolutely trust: one on the Lafayette and two on the Occoquan. They gained my trust through our rowing experiences together, both in practices and in races. The specific experiences included expert turning, smooth docking, quick commands, and good decisions in races. I have often joked that if “coxswain X” told me to row staight for the shore, I would do it”. I have rowed with several other coxswains. Many of whom I consider to be competent, but people who have not yet earned my absolute trust (that “row into the shore” kind of trust). I have also rowed with a couple of coxswains I do not trust based on experiences in crashing into docks, running aground, or receiving confusing commands.

This weekend, I was nervous about rowing in windy conditions with a coxswain I didn't know well. We ended up scratching that race because not everyone in the boat was comfortable going out on the river when winds were forecasted to be 20 mph with gusts up to 40 mph (and, honestly, who is?). I did row later in the day, in a four instead of an eight, and with a coxswain I had never met. Rowing with a coxswain I had never met was a leap of faith. I took that leap based on the trust I had in the experience of the three other rowers with me and the visible weather conditions. While the wind was still blowing, the clouds had cleared away and the sun was now shining brightly. It is amazing what a bit of sunshine will do for me. When the sky was grey at my house and I saw a bird flying backwards in the wind, I didn't imagine myself racing at all. When midday arrived and those strong winds blew the clouds away, I felt better about the prospect of rowing.

I wish there was a way to judge coxswains I meet before going on the water with them. I asked our coxswain Maxim (we called him Max) what boats he had coxed and how many times he had been on the river that day. Happily, he had been on the river twice already coxing an eight and a four. He had just the racecourse experience we needed – local knowledge that was as recent as it gets. I still got into the boat with him without knowing how much overall coxing experience he had. I suppose I also transferred the trust I had in our Racing Director Eleanor to Max because Eleanor had found the coxswain at the regatta that afternoon. That is not a logical risk analysis.

The end results was that Max was a very good coxswain. He was aware of discomfort or nervousness in the boat. He counseled us to stay calm and focus on our recovery technique to keep the boat set as we rowed in very stiff winds and choppy water up to the start. During the race, where we had better water conditions, he kept us to row hard and to keep up our pace. The only item on which I disagreed with him (and where I pretty much ignored his command) was his call for us to increase our strokes per minute above 30 during the last 500 meters. This is something that works for high school rowers, but I knew my boat mates well enough to know that racing our spm above 30 would not speed up our boat. I know I would begin to shorten my strokes and deliver no additional power to the boat.

In terms of my own abilities, I learned that I could row in the stroke seat in windy conditions. This is something I had never done before. I was able to set the race pace that I wanted (and we won our race, beating at least one boat that we expected to be beaten by) and get through the gusts of wind that buffeted our boat during the race. The more challenging row, though, was getting up to the start when the wind was blowing more steadily hard. There were a couple of instances where it felt as if the wind lifted our boat on one side out of the water. I was able to avoid panicking; I attribute that ability to the miles I have rowed on water in the last two years. I have had a few occasions rowing in windy and choppy conditions so I knew what some of it felt like (the difference in racing this weekend was that the air temperature was 40 degrees colder than my previous experiences). The row to the starting line was not fun, but I was able to do it. I enjoyed our row during the race. We might have had the best 10 minutes of weather for the day. We were hit by gusts of wind, but the steady stiff wind that hit us before the start lightened as we raced down the course. We even had one short section where the winds seemed to die down completely and we made good time with strong strokes in a set boat.

I and the members of my club need to take weather conditions seriously. I believe I did. I was willing to scratch my early boat when there were the worst of conditions. The weather did improve throughout the day. The sunshine made me feel better, but that is not a logical improvement in the weather conditions. I need to keep that in mind when evaluating future conditions. I did learn, however, that I can row – and race – in windy conditions.

A Man a Plan a Canal Panama

 I recently experienced in rowing the benefits of approaching something with a plan and being flexible with that plan. As part of my preparation for rowing head race season (head races are long distance races of about 5000 meters), I have turned in a time for 6000 meters on an erg (rowing machine). In the last two weeks or so, I gone on the erg three times. The first time was to get a feel for what 6000 meters feels like on an erg, so I rowed three 2000 meters pieces. The second and third times, I rowed 6000 meters straight.

This story requires an explanation of the information the erg provides me (or to anyone else) rowing on it. The machine has a digital display that displays a simulated distance that you have rowed. It shows how many strokes per minute you are rowing. It also displays a 500 meter split time based on (I believe) your most recent two strokes to give you an idea of the pace at which you are rowing. You can modify the display to show other information such as calories burned or to show a graph illustrating the power curve of the effort you put into your stroke. I prefer seeing the power curve.

In the trio of 2000 meter pieces that I rowed on my first outing, I rowed an average of 25 strokes per minute. When I added the three pieces together – which, admittedly, had three minute rest periods between each piece – I had a 6000 meter time of 25 minutes and 41 seconds. I didn't know what to expect in terms of a time, I was neither pleased nor displeased with the results. I determined that I needed to improve that time when I talked to some of my teammates who were turning in times in the 24 minute range.

The next week, I rowed a 6000 meter piece on the erg. I rowed it in 25 minutes and 31 seconds at an average stroke rate of 23 strokes per minute (spm). I was happy to not go backwards in comparing my time to aggregated time of my previous outing, but I knew I still needed to improve. I noticed a couple key facts on this outing. First, I was able to basically maintain the same time rowing 6000 meters straight as I did rowing three 2000 meter pieces that had rest breaks. I did this with a lower average stroke per minute rate. Rowing is funny in that a higher stroke rate doesn't necessarily equate to a better time or a faster boat. I also noticed that during my warm up I had started at an 18 spm with an estimated time better than what I was rowing at the 23 spm or 25 spm range.

For my third outing, I incorporated my observations into a plan for improving my 6000 meter time. The first step in my plan would be to reduce the effort I was expending in my warm up. My strongest power curves (taken from the digital readout) were coming from those 18 spm warm up strokes. I would use the warm up just for that: to warm up my muscles. My next step would be to lower my stroke rating at 22 spm. I have observed in the past that I felt I could “row all day” at 22 spm on long erg workouts or outings on the boat. I would start out with a very strong press – the kind I was seeing in my 18 spm workouts – take a long recovery, and press hard again. I knew that, over the course of the 6000 meters, that strong press would diminish. I would still get a very strong start. My last portion of my plan was to bump up my stroke rating at the very end, two spm at a time so that I would close out the piece rowing at 30 spm.

I started out rowing my 22 spm with strong strokes getting a 1:52 500 meter split estimate every two strokes (according to the digital readout). I held that split for about 1000 meters. I fell off that split in the next 1000 meters, so that my first 2000 meters came in at about eight minutes. I maintained my stroke rating and kept pressing so that my 500 meter split estimate remained between 2:00 and 2:10 for the next 2500 meters. During the last 500 meters, I had planned to up begin increasing my rating, but when I did that, my 500 meter split estimate worsened. I was increasing the stroke rating my lessening my recovery time and loosing power on my drive. I made a quick decision to hold onto my 22 spm rating for a little bit longer and my 500 meter split estimate improved again. I rose my stroke rating in the last 150 meters or so to about 27 and finished the entire piece in 24 minutes and 44 seconds.

24:44 still isn't a great time, it is in the middle of times worldwide for my age group (just below the 50^th percentile). I was still pleased with my 47 second improvement and attributed it to approaching the piece with a plan and being willing to make quick adjustments to my plan while I was rowing. I could have just told myself to row as hard and as fast as I could and hope for the best, but I did better with having a plan.

The same concept can be applied to any of our endeavors. For years, I have done well in many of my efforts at work by just applying more energy and animation to whatever I was doing. That can be effective to a point. There are limits to what anyone can do by himself or herself by just applying more energy. At some point, applying that energy is just flopping around really fast. Planning our actions and working with others multiplies what we are able to accomplish. I realize as I type this that this is a basic concept, but my experience on the rowing machine provided me a concrete example of the benefits of having a plan.

I am using this experience to think about times at work or in volunteer work when I could have done better with a plan and with the willingness to be flexible in that plan. What experiences do you have where you know you benefited from having a plan?

Humility on a New Boat

 I recently started a new job with a new company in a new area. Likewise, I have recently joined a new rowing club and in the last few weeks joined a new boat. In both situations, I went from a comfortable situation where I possessed a certain amount of respect and responsibility to a new situation where I was an unknown quantity and knew less about how things work than anyone else.

At work, I have 11 years of help desk and call experience upon which to draw. I have had to learn what is the culture, how much I can leverage my experience to influence events, and how much I need to listen to those around me. In my first three months, I have been growing in confidence and acting independently. This has brought me some successes. One being in leading the team to develop a more efficient way of producing a client deliverable. Another being in pressing another vendor for details to confirm that they can provide us what we need (“leveraging my experience”). It has also caused me to make some mistakes, where I would act based on what sense at my previous jobs, but would find I acted in error based on what I didn't know.

On the boat, I have much less experience and have listened more. Even in listening more, I have still reached out for opportunities. The chief opportunity has been in signing up for a race in Philadelphia. This put me rowing in the “A boat” and rowing with much more experienced rowers. These are guys with better technique, greater strength, and faster times than me. I am clearly the weakest member of the team. This shows from my position on the boat. On the novice boat, I have often rowed in seat seven where I am one of the two people setting the pace. On this boat, I am rowing in seat two where I can follow the rest of the boat. The good thing for me is that my teammates are willing to help me and provide advice. Even in just two weeks, I am becoming a better rower.

In both situations – less so at work, more so at rowing – I have displayed genuine humility. At work, it has helped me get along with others whose experience differs from mine. At rowing, it has helped me focus on improving my own technique by following the advice of my teammates and the coach. A sense of humility is proper in any new environment. It enables me to be more aware of what I am doing, what is going on around me, and what people are saying and doing. I still trust in my own abilities and will do many things my own way (at rowing, I insist on carrying my oars the way people at my old club did – over the shoulder instead of by the hand), but a humble awareness of my surroundings helps me incorporate into my own experience what others have to offer.

Another Value of Networking (or Just Listening) and the Power of Analogy

I am wrapping up a business trip where I have been tasked to collect information for transferring work from one contracting company to another contracting company. This involves a lot of listening, observing, and being sensitive to people who work for an organization that is losing work. I accomplished what I set out to do, but I also gained a new perspective on something I have worked with for many years.

I have observed and measured help desk and call center phone calls for a long time.  In all of the measurements I have made, including DPMO (Defects Per Million Opportunities), I have looked at what happens per phone call. The person I spoke to today had a different perspective. He described phone calls in terms of book publishing: the longer the book, the more opportunities there are for errors. This provided me the epiphany, or the idea, at least, of measuring errors or events not in terms of errors or events per phone call, but errors or events per phone call minute. I have long known that short phone calls are easier than long ones, but it took talking to this person and hearing his book publishing analogy to consider the idea of measuring events per call minute. This perspective may turn out to be irrelevant in the work I do, but I am still thankful for hearing someone else's new way of looking at something that is familiar to me.

My point isn't that the idea itself is so important (it probably isn't important in your work). What is important to me, and I hope is important to you, is the value I found in listening to someone else. Talking to people outside your own organization is valuable because it gets you outside your own organization's culture of doing things a particular way. Limiting yourself to exchanging ideas only with people in your own organization is like limiting genetic selection in a closed population (think of birth defects occurring among European royalty at the beginning of the 20^th century or of the isolated lion population in the caldera of a dormant volcano in the Ngorongoro Conservation Area in Tanzania). Exchanging ideas only with your coworkers provides the same limitations and possibly limits the quality of your results.

Take opportunities to join professional organizations and civic groups. Find ways to visit organizations who do similar work as you do. Not only do you expand your professional network, but you get to hear new perspectives and new ways of doing things (think of it as cross pollinating your ideas and experiences with those of others). What you hear might be related to something that you have long taken for granted. That is what happened to me today.

The Last Days...Until a New Opportunity

Tomorrow is my last day at the company where I have worked for 11 years.  Eleven years is a long enough time to tie my experience to larger things.  Many people talk about how people grieve after being laid off in the same way that they grieve after losing a loved one.  My situation is different because I am leaving of my own volition to pursue a new opportunity with a different company, but I still think of my resignation as something of a complete closure.

During the last weeks since tendering my resignation, I have been working as normal:  meeting with my direct reports to coach and help them develop, investigating errors to identify the root cause and develop with other people the solutions, and performing the administrative tasks associated with my customer service supervisor role.  Some people have remarked their appreciation that I have continued to do that.  Others have expressed surprise that I haven’t kicked up my heels and relaxed these last days.

Working as normal, even after my resignation, is the most natural thing I could think to do.  Tying my work experience to larger things, I think of the remembrances I hear of celebrities and other people who work, or do what they believe in, right up until their death.  I always smile at those types of remembrances.  As an example, journalist Daniel Schorr, who passed away in July 2010, worked right up to the end of his life.  I listened to radio political commentaries he had recorded just two weeks before he died at the age of ninety three.  Ninety three!  I love the thought of being able to make the most out of your entire life, the thought of someone who is blessed and fortunate enough to be able to do so.  I hope that when my time is up, I have the strength and courage to keep doing what is important to me up until the end.

Working as normal also ties into my own reputation.  I try to lead by the example of my speech, by listening, and by my actions.  Even though my coworkers’ memories of me at work will, and should, fade with time, I want them to see that how I behave and act really is a part of who I am and not just a performance.  Each of our reputations, built on our own speech and actions,  are all that we have to carry with us throughout this life.

When you change jobs, whether or not it is after a long stint at an organization or a short one, take care to ensure that your actions during the last days of your job illustrate a part of who you are.